Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 85
  1. #71
    Regular avan's Avatar
    Weasyl
    avan_kaira
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    99
    Quote Originally Posted by Fay V View Post
    The issue is U.S. Laws say we can not allow minors to access "obscene" material. U.S. Law also indicates that bare female breasts with nipples are unacceptable for minors, but male nipples and any fat in that area is fine.
    I wasn't taking issue with that - thats a legal constraint which I understand (unfortunately) exists due to society being backwards. Its rather the distinction between general & moderate that I had been taking issue with - where assuming the LOD (Level of Detail) is identical, suddenly having a certain class of breasts becomes unacceptable? Thats what I take issue with (Or perhaps the initial interpretation of the rule given to me was wrong, but just goes to show that it ought to be clarified).

  2.   Click here to go to the next staff post in this thread.   #72
    Didn't try, Succeeded Fay V's Avatar



    Weasyl
    Fayv
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,379
    Quote Originally Posted by avan View Post
    I wasn't taking issue with that - thats a legal constraint which I understand (unfortunately) exists due to society being backwards. Its rather the distinction between general & moderate that I had been taking issue with - where assuming the LOD (Level of Detail) is identical, suddenly having a certain class of breasts becomes unacceptable? Thats what I take issue with (Or perhaps the initial interpretation of the rule given to me was wrong, but just goes to show that it ought to be clarified).
    That's not really the case.
    For instance, this is general: Avatar kids in bathing suits
    All the same level of detail. The guys are shirtless but the nipples are not super defined or detailed. Girls breasts are covered, the nipples aren't defined and poking through the material.

    It's moderate if the suits are more revealing, for guys wearing a speedo with an big bulge, for girls wearing a bikini that defies the laws of physics. Both have their own specifics based on equipment available.

    For instance if guys are covered but the bulge is so clearly defined we know his religion it will be rated up. For girls if the suit covering her breasts may as well just be painted on, it will be rated up.

    It's a matter of rating up over the detail for the area in question. The only major different is a guy with detail nips showing can be moderate but a girl with visible nips is mature.

  3. #73
    Regular avan's Avatar
    Weasyl
    avan_kaira
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    99
    Um... Ok I think I'm just getting more confused at this point. I wasn't talking about nipples, but rather what 'clearly defined breasts' meant. Also I think a lot of that post went over my head, but probably since we were talking about different things.

  4. #74
    Senior Gamedog's Avatar
    Weasyl
    Gamedog
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Москва
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    843
    "for girls wearing a bikini that defies the laws of physics. "

    ??

  5.   Click here to go to the next staff post in this thread.   #75
    Didn't try, Succeeded Fay V's Avatar



    Weasyl
    Fayv
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamedog View Post
    "for girls wearing a bikini that defies the laws of physics. "

    ??
    large well defined breasts held in by straps that logically would not be able to support the breasts nor stay on.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by avan View Post
    Um... Ok I think I'm just getting more confused at this point. I wasn't talking about nipples, but rather what 'clearly defined breasts' meant. Also I think a lot of that post went over my head, but probably since we were talking about different things.
    This is well defined, moderate breasts, note this is from an anime that wasn't shown on american tv before 10 pm

    Here's an example from pokemon. Here is a general pic, it showed for kids on daytime tv. you can see she's female, you can see she has breasts, but it isn't well defined clevage.

    Here's same show, same character, more definition of the breasts makes this moderate. this ep was deemed inappropriate for kids under 13 and was pulled from US markets. James (purple haired person) in particular has well defined breasts and a suit that would be deemed moderate.

  6. #76
    Senior Gamedog's Avatar
    Weasyl
    Gamedog
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Москва
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    843
    OH lol okay I get what you mean.

  7. #77
    Senior Gamedog's Avatar
    Weasyl
    Gamedog
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Москва
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    843
    Something I was thinking about earlier tonight and another reason why I think the rules here are BS: It's been stated that the rules carry over from feral to anthro, vise versa, whatever.
    Nipples are to be put into 18+, it's called "artistic nudity" all the way up to porn. If you draw nipples on a short-coated dog, you have to slide it into 18+

    This is a crock. Y'all have to be joking, right? You can't be serious.

    I made this for this thread
    http://vpx.pl/i/2014/06/24/GIRLS.png

  8. #78
    Retired Staff piņardilla's Avatar

    Weasyl
    pinardilla
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Gender
    Claims to be a porpoise.
    Posts
    1,287
    Dogs don't have visibly developed mammaries.
         
       
    Now,
              let's go play, together...
       
    Together under the
                     clearest of
    blue skies.

  9. #79
    Senior Gamedog's Avatar
    Weasyl
    Gamedog
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Москва
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    843
    Quote Originally Posted by piņardilla View Post
    Dogs don't have visibly developed mammaries.
    One would think the rules would be that clear cut, right?
    The issue is nipples and "you dont have to draw them". yeah well you also don't have to draw tits on an anthro, you don't have to give a bird gal tits, you don't have to give a furry hair on his head, you don't have to draw your furries with four toes on their feet instead of five
    thing is, it's a style choice that is unfairly being censored needlessly.
    I asked this question before. ive literally been arguing about this for months now.

    if nipples on a feral dog are cool,i can't see why anything i've brought up before wouldn't be. i'm seriously pissed off because I feel like this is being needlessly shoved to the side as porn or (lol, i literally received this explanation once) "nudity"
    feral fursonas are considered nude. (and thus,one would think nipples on a bitch is considered nudity because a bitch is a female (sex) dog)

    EDIT:Also, an example i provided that showed a tiny glimpse of a horse's ball was considered fine because it was "just a bump"
    so
    just saying. where is the line drawn, honestly. where. i have 3 more ref sheets to to that have male dogs, just wondering if i'm gonna have to label my entire fucking gallery as nudity, or have the style of my art vary throughout my gallery and look inconsistent, or spend time re-drawing my art
    just because nobody wants to accept the fact that there is no legal reason for this rule.
    Last edited by Gamedog; 06-24-2014 at 02:57 AM.

  10. #80
    Premium User QT Melon's Avatar


    Weasyl
    QTMelon
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Gender
    Female
    Posts
    1,478

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •