Putting the *visual* submission into a folder called "Characters" does not make it a *character* submission.Quote:
Originally Posted by anubis_werewolf
Printable View
Putting the *visual* submission into a folder called "Characters" does not make it a *character* submission.Quote:
Originally Posted by anubis_werewolf
What's the difference?Quote:
Originally Posted by vulpixdotus
I don't think we are even talking about the same thing.
Thanks anyway. I'll just wait until an admin helps me, not that I expect to get an answer back.
I didn't bite your head off, I put emphasis.
and there's nothing to help with. i explained it.
in fact, it's even easier to explain.
yes, you are putting the pictures of your characters under visualize. this is fine. you're doing that correctly. good job.
what the admins are talking about is creating a character. See up in the picture where it says "character--create a profile for an original character with an image from your computer" ? you're not doing that. so this doesn't even apply to you.
If you need help beyond that, then personally I don't even think an admin can help you.
I don't understand what this Characters gallery that you are talking about is even for. It seems pointless.Quote:
Originally Posted by acelion
I didn't understand what was going on, so I asked for help.
No need to be rude about it.
This was the funniest three pages. lmao
"Rude" lol
But in all seriousness. Guys, you goofed on this. Kinda hard.
You don't honestly believe this belongs in General do you? https://www.weasyl.com/~xp/submissions/1495586/saki
Because that's exactly where it is now.
Nice to know my asking for help is considered "funny" -_-Quote:
Originally Posted by XoPachi
I don't know why I even bother asking for help here.
They're correct. Possibly a little terse, but correct nonetheless.Quote:
Originally Posted by anubis_werewolf
- - - Updated - - -
It does when General is defined as "Not 18+", which is where we're at now. It's either adult material (sexually explicit or otherwise) or it's not.Quote:
Originally Posted by XoPachi
This should also resolve one of the biggest problems we had with Moderate - people posting full blown nudity thinking it's okay for 13+.
- - - Updated - - -
Clerical error in the news post. I've tidied this up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank LeRenard
True. I do like that full nudity is now considered 18+.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendikins
That said, why is drug use not 18+? Why are sexualised and erotic situations and fashion not considered 18+ regardless of whether or not actual nudity is present?
And why oh why is drug use described as comedic?
If you can clear that up and make General actually appropriate for younger audiences then I'll support the new guidelines.